VP Weekly Wrap - 21 August 2026

The VP Bank Quality Score - A Specialized Approach
Standard factor models don’t work well with financial institutions.
Banks are a spread businesses built on levered balance sheets, so assessing quality needs to account for capital adequacy, liability management, and tail-risk avoidance.
With that, we are pleased to present our new Bank Quality Score - a quality framework specialized for global banks.
We score Bank Quality across three pillars
- Balance-sheet management
- Consistency
- Margin of safety
Our backtest show across North America, EAFE, and EM markets that the lowest-quality banks:
- Structurally underperform
- Show higher downside volatility
The framework outperforms during market crisis, when low-quality banks collapse. And it can underperform in the immediate aftermath of crisis, when market rallies can lead to a “dash-for-trash” frenzy.
Over the full cycle, however, high-quality banks tend to come out and compound steadily.
Find out how to use it Here.

Crowding Score: Popular Stocks Are Bad, Actually
"Nobody goes there anymore. It's too crowded."
Yogi Berra was probably talking about a restaurant when he said that, but he could have been describing many of the stocks in the S&P 500. The price goes up, the story gets better, and investors pile in on the comforting idea that a crowd is a hedge.
If only it was so simple.
With two decades of data, we tested what actually happens when real news hits a crowded stock. What we found was that popular stocks gained less on good news and lost more on bad news, than their less-loved peers.
In other words, crowded stocks capture less of the upside even when the news is good.
Popular stocks, it turns out, are inherently fragile.
Read more here.

Stay Connected
Our research is built for investors who need timely, repeatable insights.
.png)

